<
Back | Forward | Table
of Contents >
Chapter
5: Maine Epidemiological Profile
The
following epidemiological profile describes HIV and AIDS prevalence and
incidence, as well as discussing overall Maine demographic
characteristics. In this way,
it is hoped that readers may gain an understanding of the epidemic and how
it affects Maine people in the unique context of our State.
The information outlined in this profile is also provided to CPG
members when they consider both populations at risk and interventions to
serve those populations.
Unlike
past years, this chapter does not include the descriptions of specific
populations at risk. Instead, epidemiological characteristics are inserted within
each one of the prioritized Population Descriptions, found in Chapter 7.
This change was made in an attempt to more clearly link populations
at risk with related epidemiological information.
5.1
Maine Demographic Characteristics
Maine,
is a large, rural, and relatively poor state.
Within Maine there are dramatic variations in population density,
socioeconomic conditions, and community resources. A synopsis of selected
state population characteristics, much of it abstracted from the 1990
Census, follows:
5.1.1
Rural vs. Urban
Residence
Fifty-five
percent of Maine's 1,227,000 residents live in rural communities, compared
to 25% for the U.S. population as a whole. Approximately one-third of the
population lives in one of the three metropolitan statistical areas (MSA's),
in and surrounding Portland, Lewiston, and Bangor. The Portland MSA is the
state's largest with 222,000 persons,.
The
majority of Mainers, almost two-thirds of the population, live along the
I-95 corridor and on the coast. But vast areas of western, northern and
downeast Maine are thinly populated, and
distances to Maine cities from some rural communities are
considerable. With 37 persons per square mile, Maine is the least densely
populated state east of the Mississippi.
Access to medical care and social services from many areas can be
difficult. Despite the large rural population of the state, just under 3%
of the workforce is employed in agriculture, forestry and fishing.
5.1.2
Race, Ethnicity, Culture, and Language
The
proportion of non-white and Hispanic residents is small, less than 2% in
total. Of 1,227,928 residents counted in the 1990 Census, 5,138 (0.4%)
were black, 5,998 (0.5%) were American Indian, Aleut, or Eskimo, and 6,683
(0.5%) were Asian or Pacific Islander. Hispanic residents, 6,829 persons,
constituted 0.6% of the population.
While
there is geographic variability in the proportion of non-white and
Hispanic residents in cities and counties, there are few identifiable
areas of high minority population concentration.
Among American Indians in Maine, fewer than thirty percent live on
the reservations of the state's five tribes.
A
cultural issue of interest (though one that has not been well-defined in
terms of its public health ramifications), is the relatively high
proportion of Franco-Americans living in the state.
Data from the 1990 Census indicates that French and French-Canadian
ancestry represents 22% of all ancestries reported by Maine residents,
compared to 4% for the nation as a whole, and 14% for all of New England.
Some cities (Biddeford and Lewiston, among others) and areas of
Northern Maine have significantly greater proportions of Franco-American
residents. Considerations of culture, socioeconomic status, and religion
among Franco-Americans may influence approaches to prevention.
The
proportion of Mainers native to their state of residence (71%) is slightly
higher than that seen nationally (67%).
While a relatively small proportion of persons over age five (1.8%
compared to 6.1% nationally) report "not speaking English very
well," the absolute number (27,759) should be of some concern to
prevention workers. In addition, over 7,000 residents are foreign-born
persons who entered the U.S. after 1980; cultural and language issues must
also be considered here.
5.1.3
Socioeconomic Characteristics
As
of 1996, 11.2% of Maine residents were living below the poverty line
(U.S.: 13.7%). At the same
time, reported per capita income ($19,590) compares poorly to the U.S.
reported per capital income ($22,713). The 1990 U.S. Census indicates that, among families with
young children headed by women, poverty rates are significantly higher in
Maine (63%) than for the U.S. (57%), and in some counties (Androscoggin:
73%) are higher still.
Educational
attainment rates in Maine are similar to those for the U.S. as a whole
(proportion of adults who are high school graduates: 79% for Maine, 75%
U.S.) but vary widely inside the state (Cumberland County: 85%,
Androscoggin County: 72%).
5.1.4
Summary
In
comparison with the rest of the U.S., Maine's population may be considered
relatively rural, poor, and racially homogeneous.
At the same time, there is tremendous variability in demographic
characteristics among counties, regions, and towns.
The large size of the state presents limited access to services for
a rural population scattered in areas remote from the more urban central
and southern metropolitan communities.
Maine's
relatively small, scattered racial and ethnic minority populations present
difficulties for focused minority outreach efforts.
In addition, a small but significant population of recent
immigrants and non-English speakers must be considered in prevention
activities.
5.2
HIV/AIDS in Maine
Through
the end of 1998, 840 Maine AIDS diagnoses had been reported to the Bureau
of Health. An estimated
950-1,300 persons in the state are believed to be living with HIV
infection. The following
pages describe sources of information about HIV and AIDS, show recent AIDS
and HIV incidence, and give summary information about populations most
affected.
Detailed
epidemiological information pertaining to each prioritized population is
included within the Population Descriptions found in Chapter 7.
5.2.1
Sources of Information about HIV and AIDS in Maine
Data
for assessing the HIV epidemic in Maine comes from a number of sources.
These include the following:
-
physician
AIDS case reports;
-
reports
of HIV infection from physicians and Anonymous HIV Testing and
Counseling sites;
-
blinded
HIV seroprevalence surveys conducted in STD clinic patients;
-
hospital
discharge data;
-
HIV
screening of Maine military recruits and blood donors; and
-
laboratory
reports to the Bureau of Health of positive HIV tests and CD4 counts.
Additional
information important to assessing the state of the epidemic in Maine
includes reports of other sexually transmitted infections and Hepatitis B
infection. None of these data
sources alone provide a comprehensive picture of the epidemic in Maine.
Collectively, however, they can provide at least the outline of
current conditions and a sense of the direction in which the epidemic is
going.
5.2.2
AIDS Data
Communicable
disease reporting rules for the state of Maine require health
professionals to report all AIDS diagnoses to the Bureau of Health.
The information reported is considered highly confidential and
epidemiologic data is released to the public only after it is determined
that it cannot be used to directly or indirectly identify any individual.
AIDS case reports include information on age, sex, race, HIV risks,
town of residence and place of diagnosis as well as clinical data
including CD4 count (a marker of the strength of a person's immune
system).
The
principal advantages of AIDS case data involve reliability and consistency
(most persons with AIDS seek medical care and physicians report most AIDS
cases) as well as the level of detail that is provided.
A concerted effort is made to collect accurate and complete
information. But AIDS case
report data also has several important limitations:
-
AIDS
statistics include data only on those individuals whose clinical
conditions meet the CDC AIDS Case Definition. Most cases are defined
on the basis of a CD4 count of less than 200 in the setting of an HIV
diagnosis. Therefore, AIDS case reports do not include persons with
HIV infection who are asymptomatic.
-
Persons
with AIDS who reside in Maine, but were diagnosed with AIDS while
living in another state, are not included in these statistics.
Therefore the report statistics underestimate the actual number of
persons living in Maine with AIDS.
-
Because
the incubation period for AIDS is fairly long--often 10 or more years
from infection until the onset of AIDS-defining illness--it has a
limited value in telling us about recent patterns of HIV transmission.
AIDS Case Reports
Through December 1998,
840 AIDS cases had been reported to the Bureau of Health, with 462 deaths.
Thirty-three cases, including 26 men and 7 women, were reported from
January to December, 1998. 1998
case demographics are described below:
Transmission
Risk: Of the 840 cases of AIDS reported to the Bureau of Health
through December 1998, risk for HIV transmission is as follows: Men Who
Have Sex with Men: 555 cases
(66% of total); Injecting Drug Users:
95 (11%); Men Who Have Sex with Men and Inject Drugs:
28 (3%); Hemophilia/Coagulation Disorder:
25 (3%); Heterosexual Cases: 65 (8%); Recipients of Transfusion /
Blood Components: 9 (1%); Child of parent with HIV: 8 (1%); Risk Unknown:
55 (7%)
As in past years, the majority of new AIDS diagnoses were among men who
have sex with men (MSM), who comprise 18 of 33 cases reported in 1998.
Other transmission categories include: heterosexual transmission (6
cases), injecting drug use (3 cases), and one case attributed to treatment
for hemophilia
Race:
For the 840 cumulative AIDS cases reported in Maine, 94% are White.
Other races represented include Black (3%), Hispanic (2%), American
Indians (1%) and Asians (<1%).
For the 33 cases in 1998, one Black, one Hispanic and one American
Indian/Alaskan Native case were reported.
Race was identified as White for the remaining 30 (91%) diagnoses
in 1998.
AIDS
Trends by Region and Metropolitan Residence: During the mid-1980's, the majority of persons diagnosed with
AIDS in Maine lived in southern Maine. AIDS incidence has increased in all
regions, but since 1990 half of all new cases were living outside of the
southern part of the state at the time of their diagnosis.
Similarly, more recently diagnosed individuals are much more likely
to be living in a community outside of the state's three metropolitan
areas.
Despite
this trend, the cumulative AIDS incidence rate continues to highest in
Cumberland county and for the city of Portland located therein.
Portland has a rate almost five times that of the cumulative rate
for Maine as a whole, and almost three times the rate for Lewiston, the
city with the second highest cumulative incidence
For diagnoses reported
during 1998, 12 cases (36%) were diagnosed among residents of southern
Maine, nine cases (27%) in central Maine and 12 (36%) cases in northern
Maine.
Pediatric
HIV/AIDS: There is a
relatively low incidence of pediatric (<13 years at diagnosis) AIDS in
Maine, with a cumulative total of 10 reported cases since 1984 and 1996,
and no cases reported after 1996.
Most cases of pediatric AIDS in the United States are related to
perinatal transmission (transmission from infected mother to child during
pregnancy or delivery) in which the mother has an HIV risk related to
injecting drug use or sexual contact with a male injecting drug user. The
fact that there are relatively low levels of injecting drug use in Maine
may explain why there are low pediatric AIDS incidence rates in Maine
relative to southern New England and the Middle Atlantic states.
Decline
in AIDS Morbidity and Mortality:
Nationally, There has been a marked decrease in the number of new
AIDS cases and deaths due to AIDS. During
1997, for example, more than 50% fewer AIDS deaths were reported than in
1995. This is due in large
part to improvements and availability of medical treatments, which often
allow for both dramatic recovery from, and prevention of, AIDS-related
illness.
Maine mirrors this national trend. The following graph shows Maine AIDS cases and deaths
reported from 1984 through 1998. Since
1995, both AIDS diagnoses and deaths have declined in this state: in 1995,
112 new cases were diagnosed; in 1997, the number of new cases had
declined to only 36 cases. Likewise,
deaths decreased from 70 in 1995 to 20 in 1997.
5.2.3
HIV Data
Maine
physicians and laboratories are required to report new cases of HIV
infection diagnosis to the Bureau of Health, currently without name or
other patient identifiers. Demographic
and risk data is collected for these cases, but little denominator
information is available. Starting July 1, 1999, providers will be
required to report positive HIV tests using either patient name or a
patient identifier code. This
new reporting method will make HIV data more useful, and prevent duplicate
reporting.
While
reviewing HIV testing data, it is important to understand that persons
testing HIV positive are unlikely to be a representative sample of all
persons with HIV infection, many of whom have not been tested.
Accordingly, both the number of positive tests and the risk and
demographic characteristics should be considered cautiously.
For this reason, cumulative totals of HIV-positive tests are not
discussed in this epidemiological profile; only HIV-positive tests
reported during 1998 are highlighted below.
Transmission
Risk: Thirty-two positive HIV antibody test results were reported to
the Bureau of Health during 1998. Twenty-nine
were male, 3 were female. The
primary risk for transmission of those receiving positive results during
1998 is as follows: men who have sex with men (MSM): 14 (44%);
heterosexual contact: 12 (38%); injecting drug users (IDU): 4 (13%); MSM
and IDU combined risk: 1 (3%); transfusion recipient: 1 (3%).
Race/Ethnicity:
Twenty-nine individuals testing positive (91%) in 1998 were white, 1
person was Black, 1 person was Hispanic and 1 person was American
Indian/Alaskan Native.
Region:
Forty-eight percent of those testing positive during 1998 lived in
southern Maine. Another 29% lived in central Maine and 23% were from the
northern part of the state.
Decline
in Number of Positive Tests: Overall,
the number of people testing positive in 1998 represents a decline in
comparison with recent years; for example, 89 people tested positive in
1996, 68 in 1995, and 70 people during 1994.
Maine has seen a steady decline in the number of people testing
positive since the late 1980s. During 1997, 48 positive
HIV antibody tests were reported to the Bureau of Health.
The number of specimens tested has remained largely constant and
the reason for this trend is unclear, although it may be due to the fact
that fewer at-risk people are currently seeking testing.
Estimates of the Number
of Persons with HIV Living in Maine
A
recent analysis of state and national surveillance data suggests that
there are approximately 950-1,300 persons living with HIV in Maine.
The data available is not sufficient to arrive at a meaningful
estimate of the distribution of those numbers in specific areas or
populations within Maine.
5.2.4
Other Sources of HIV/AIDS Data
Military Recruit Data
Since
screening was initiated in 1985, only one of 30,000 (<0.01%) Maine
resident recruits has tested HIV+. The
national average has been .09%. Military
recruits are less likely than other adolescents and young adults to have
high risks for HIV.
HIV Seroprevalence
among STD Clinic Patients
Since
1990, blinded HIV seroprevalence surveys
(conducted among patients treated for non-HIV related STD's at
three municipal clinics) have shown an overall mean seropositivity of 0.4%
(range by year: 0%-0.8%) in a predominantly urban, male clinic population.
The rates have been highest among self-identified gay and bisexual
men, and in patients over age 30. There
has been no significant trend in seropositivity from 1990 - 1998.
The
population surveyed under-represents women and may also under represent
gay men. At the same time,
this population may be at an increased HIV risk because of the fact that
they are being treated or evaluated for another sexually transmitted
disease.
While
the surveys do not have the statistical power to detect subtle changes and
provide a very limited view of the populations at high HIV risk,
they may provide a reasonable sentinel for large increases in HIV
prevalence among sexually active urban poor and working class
heterosexuals.
5.3
Sexually Transmitted Diseases Other Than HIV
In
1998, there were 1,073 cases of chlamydia, 67 cases of gonorrhea and one
(1) case of secondary syphilis. Maine
has one of the lowest rates for gonorrhea and syphilis incidence in the
United States. Likewise, there
has been a more than 60% decrease in all three diseases between 1990 and
1998.
As
the above figures show, infection with Chlamydia is the most commonly
reported sexually transmitted disease in Maine.
High Chlamydia rates among Maine teenage girls are of particular
concern. Forty-five percent
of female chlamydia infections were reported among females between 15 and
19 years old.
Recent
scientific evidence shows a strong link between infection with a sexually
transmitted disease and HIV transmission.
STD infection leads to both increased susceptibility for acquiring
HIV and increased infectiousness as well, meaning that it is more likely
both to infect someone else or become infected with HIV if one is already
infected with another STD. Some
reports show that STD's increase the risk of HIV transmission by two- to
four-fold.
5.3
Conclusion
Through
a variety of data sources, a general picture emerges of the shape and
direction of the HIV epidemic in Maine.
Though AIDS cases and deaths and HIV-positive tests reports
continue to decline in the state, several key populations continue to be
disproportionately affected. These
include males who have sex with males, injection drug users, women, people
of color and youth. Epidemiological
information about these specific groups is shared later in the document,
in Chapter 7. Information
about the CPG priority population “Other At-Risk Populations with
Special Needs” is also presented, although there is a paucity of data
about this group.
In
addition, recent cases of AIDS and HIV infection are well-diffused
throughout the state, and have occurred in both urban and rural areas.
It
is important to remember that the HIV epidemic is complex and dynamic and
that there are limitations to the data; our inability to adequately
characterize “special need” populations is one such limitation.
Persons
working for HIV prevention and planning in Maine should review and discuss
the available epidemiological information and seek consultation with the
HIV/AIDS Surveillance Office as the need arises.
A focused prevention approach, such as the one advocated by the
Maine CPG, should improve our ability to intervene effectively.
< Back |
Forward | Top of Page
| Table
of Contents | Return Home > |